| A Review of: Goldberg: Variations by Jeff BurseyIt sounds like an ideal job for an author, to put a man to sleep
by reading to him, but Samuel Goldberg's task is made more difficult
by the stipulation that he can't read from works already written.
Instead, he is asked to come up with new material every night for
his employer, Tobias Westfield, a condescending pseudo-philosopher
who is unable to find rest. This is the conceit which begins the
latest novel from Gabriel Josipovici, who has had published fiction,
plays, criticism, essays and a memoir.
Novels about writers often read as an inside joke, and can be
tediously self-reflective. Goldberg: Variations does not escape the
last problem, particularly when the Goldberg story is revealed to
be a fiction created by another writer, Gerald, who struggles to
find a shape for a novel set in the nineteenth century that would
include elements such as incest, the Orkneys, marital strife, and
philosophy. When Gerald debates with a nameless muse, the narrative
steps back even further from the Goldberg story. The author thereby
risks boring a reader, or overusing a conceit the way John Barth
sometimes does, especially as neither Goldberg nor Gerald are as
inventive as Scheherazade.
While it does gaze into its own navel, Goldberg: Variations manages
to avoid serious problems through its elegant style and restrained
tone, and its graceful engagement with metaphysical and aesthetic
questions. As in Contre-Jour: A Triptych after Pierre Bonnard (1986),
where a visual image helps to provide the structure, this novel
relies on Bach's Goldberg Variations as Josipovici defines and
redefines events, and approaches topics from several directions.
The first ninety-four pages are conditional, as if a bridge was
being built from one fixed spot, extending to the other side that
can't be seen but surely must be there. With the introduction of
Gerald, the reader is provided with an alternative view of what has
come before. The structure of the fugue, where "[t]he pursuer
turns into the pursued and the pursued into the pursuer, and the
headlong flight ceases to be a flight and becomes a dance,"
allows Josipovici the opportunity to explore in a variety of ways
the fragility of marriage, the use of language (there is a discussion
on the character of Odysseus) and the act of creation.
In Westfield the author offers a persuasive depiction of the
intellectual who considers friends, family and sentiments less
valuable than ideas. While his nature doesn't elicit empathy, his
predicament compels the reader to take interest, as does Goldberg's
attempt at a talking cure. To Westfield the world feels dead, but
he still believes that hearing new stories will reinvigorate him.
(The Odyssey is used throughout the novel as a demonstration of an
old tale that continually engages people in productive discussion.)
This hope of being woken to life is revealed by Goldberg to be
groundless. Instead of writing new works for each night, Goldberg
offers conversation, such as what follows:
- I have the feeling, I said, and you will forgive me, sir,
if I am speaking out of turn, that your life has always
been governed by a kind of anxiety and that in order to
overcome that anxiety you have constantly rushed forward,
in both thought and deed, instead of allowing each moment
its full value.
- Go on, he said quietly, since I had come to a stop.
- Each moment, for you, I said, has only been a bridge
between one thing and another. You call that thinking. I
would prefer to call it anxiety.
A few lines down, Goldberg asks:
- Do you hear my voice?
- Yes, he said. Of course.
- Do you hear your own?
He was a long while answering. Then he said, very quietly:
- Yes, I think so.
- In the dark, I said.
I could sense that now he was waiting for me to continue.
- That is enough, I said.
- Yes, he said.
After a long time he said:
- This is the moment, then?
- It is, I said.
- Now?
- Yes.
- Our two voices in the dark?
I was silent.
- Nothing more?
- No.
I did not move. His breathing grew deeper.
- I see, he said again, after a while, in a whisper.
This dialogue could be seen as indicating the universe is godless,
that ultimately everyone is alone, or that two strangers can
communicate and comfort one another despite the darkness (and all
that word connotes). That the exchange can come across as soothing,
sobering, and at the same time chilling, is partly Josipovici's
point. He is a craftsman who makes sure the structure of Goldberg:
Variations is present at the level of the sentence. Every re-read
of this trim novel will invite a fresh interpretation.
|